Monday 1 July 2013

Film Review: Man of Steel, The Saviour of the World


I approached Man of Steel with a lot of scepticism; indeed my followers on Twitter and members of the movie group I belong to on Facebook (The Movie Smackdown) suffered my cynicism first hand. I harped on the fact that the critics had scored it low and based on the previews I had seen I claimed that Man of Steel borrowed plot lines from every superhero flick out there and that the CGI was painful to look at. I eventually saw Man of Steel after several postponements and my verdict is that it is actually a very good film!

Maybe it was the marketing overhype that we all had to endure for a full year before the film hit the big screen that annoyed me; and perhaps a certain mistrust of the franchise that gave us the sad Superman Returns (2006) that fuelled my suspicions; but deep deep down inside I knew that a team that included Christopher Nolan, Zack Snyder and David S. Goyer could not go wrong.

Man of Steel works as a reboot of the Superman film franchise. The plot immediately brings comparisons with the first two Superman films – Richard Donner’s subliminal Superman (1978) and Superman II (1980) – with the former an origin story and the latter dealing with Earth’s invasion by the insane Kryptonian General Zod and two others. Perhaps it is the benchmark set by these two earlier films and also superhero film fatigue that have stymied its Box Office figures, otherwise Man of Steel ought to reach the billion dollar mark.

Man of Steel was very visually appealing. Although I had earlier criticised the CGI and the supersonic, blurry and darting movements of the Kryptonians as they did battle (reminiscent of the character Dante in Capcom’s Devil May Cry) I have to admit that it lends some realism to the powers that they had. The destruction of Metropolis was on full kilter! It was epic!!! I mean no other superhero film (save 2008’s Hancock) provides destruction at this scale. Yes, this is what you expect to see when two super-humanoids go toe-to-toe. Man of Steel does not hold back and this is very satisfying to see on the big screen, finally a film depiction that is a worthy treatment of the destruction we see in the comics! Satisfying indeed.

The story is told at a good pace, and although the use of flashbacks was probably the best option it sometimes interrupted the flow and the build up of the film.


Thanks to the writers and the director, and great acting by Henry Cavill (The Count of Monte Cristo, Immortals) as Clark Kent/Kal-El/Superman, we get to see the internal emotional conflict that he endures. Clark’s difference from the rest of us as he struggles with an identity crisis to define who he is, while keeping his abilities secret are brought to the fore. His level of self control is aptly alien as I finally understand why Superman with all his powers still prefers to remain the goody boy scout that he is (also without the goofiness that is supposed to be Clark Kent that we saw in the Christopher Reeves’ films). In addition, in this case, it is his Earthly father, Jonathan Kent (Kevin Costner) out of love for him who instils in him a sense of belonging and self preservation at the cost of his own life. Here I find that Jor-El’s role in the first Superman film has been switched with Jonathan Kent’s, who for different reasons would prefer Clark not to interfere with the human race but fly under the radar. I watched with great shock and morbid satisfaction as Clark Kent finally killed someone so deserving as against locking them up or banishing them someplace as the one in the comics always lamely does. At the point he snaps Zod’s neck you can see the emotions that Clark is going through as he has to take a life to save a billion others, to take a fellow Kryptonian’s life in order to save his adopted humankind. No words can describe that. In the end you find that Clark Kent is more human than he is Kryptonian, more Clark Kent than he is Kal-El or even Superman. He is American through and through, born and raised in Smallville, Kansas.



I looked forward to seeing Michael Shannon (Bad Boys II, Revolutionary Road, Machine Gun Preacher, Boardwalk Empire) as General Zod. For me he was the main attraction. His performance was generally above average, with scenes where we could see glimmers of his madness. But it is my thinking that the filmmakers wanted a less psychotic General Zod, a more intelligent and 3-dimesional one. I was in no way disappointed, all that was lacking was the epic, “Kneel before Zod!!!” But hey, no one could have said that better than Terence Stamp, so why try eh?


Amy Adams as Lois Lane was average. She is the tamest of all the Lois Lane portrayals I have seen. If this was deliberate by the filmmakers, they succeeded. Her connection with Clark/Superman is quite visible and the chemistry holds promise, for she seems to be the first woman that Clark can be with, and perhaps because of the circumstances of their meeting it is the first time he tries.

It was great seeing Christopher Meloni (Law & Order: SVU) on the big screen as Colonel Nathan Hardy and his awesome acting ability showed. More films for him please. Kevin Costner was great as usual and for me his role was pivotal to the understanding of whom Clark Kent was. Diane Lane as Martha Kent was very effective and gave us a more attractive version of Mother Kent. The lovely Israeli actress, Ayelet Zurer’s (Munich, Vantage Point, Angels & Demons) performance as Lara Lor-Van leaves a distinct impression, while German Antje Traue (Pandorum, 5 Days of War) as Faora is a delight to watch. Russell Crowe as Jor-El was great, deep, intelligent and empathic –a welcome departure from the godlike Marlon Brando portrayal.


In conclusion, of immense interest to me were the parallels the filmmakers drew between Clark Kent and Jesus Christ. If I had never noticed it before Man of Steel certainly drew my attention to this. Both are not of this world and are sent from the heavens to save the world.  Like Jesus, Clark was adopted by an earthly father only to connect with his non-physical father later. Both wandered through the wilderness in a quest to discover who they were and to prepare them for the task ahead. Both were in their 30s when they began their work. At age 33, Clark gave himself up to human authority even though he was above this authority, just like Jesus gave himself up to the Pharisees. The US military handed Clark over to Zod just as the Pharisees handed over Jesus to the Romans. Indeed, one can go on and on but at the end of the day one thing is clear: according to Chris Nolan, David S. Goyer and Zack Snyder, and perhaps creators Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, Superman the Man of Steel is the Saviour of the World.





PS: As of 1 July 2013, Man of Steel has grossed over $520mm worldwide in just 17 days since its release.

4 comments:

  1. One of the points that I actually disagree with is the character of Pa Kent.
    This incarnation of Pa Kent for was not the influence I expected, he was a person who believed the worst of humanity and advocated the protection of Clark's secret at the cost of anything.
    He basically in my view was a bad influence on Clark and was responsible for his growing up being picked on like Peter Parker.
    while it led to a powerful scene when Pa Kent died, I still did not buy it all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hmmm...great point but I think it was more to protect Clark from being seen as a threat by humans before he had become to fully see himself as human. A bad influence? But what would you prefer, a superiority complex to the rest of us. Lol. Thank you for reading and commenting. It is really appreciated. :)

      Delete
  2. Nice review. You clearly outlined most of the key points that happened in the movie except a few. There are 3 things you missed out though...

    1 - The pathetic way Clark's human father died. That scene shouldn't have gone down like that. Any human being would not think twice to go back and save someone (or something) unless it was a child/kid or he was just crazy! Yup Pa Kent was definitely on the "Crazy" drugs to go back and save a dog knowing full well that a tornado/cyclone is coming.

    2 - The part where Louis just finds herself so close to Clark while giving Clark the "kiss me" look. It was so obvious that at some point, people were like do it already if you crave it so!!!!lol

    3- Can anyone give a standing ovation to the female commandant who was second in Command to General Zodd!!! No comment about her...(How could that slip your mind dear Sir!) She was clearly in capital letters...BADASS!

    I clearly disagree about Superman being on the same level of destruction as Hancock?!?! Nahh! Not even close!
    Also I was looking for a word which came out of most people's lips after the superman movie..."intense".

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Usman! Thank you for reading and commenting. All your points are valid looool! Yes, Faora erm certainly caught my attention and I did mention her. Yes, the whole Pa Kent dying was just somehow and didn't make too much sense tbh, we sha let it slide as it advances the plot. Yup, Intense is the word when it came to the fight action sequences but I disagree with you on the Hancock comparison. :)

    ReplyDelete